Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ger Ahrens's avatar

25 years of therapy, yet suicide is a constant thought. Only people of absolute faith and trust, especially children like I was at 11 years old, fall victim to predatory priests, and for most of us that is the day our faith dies, or at least becomes more of just a desperate hope, nothing near a faith in a God who loves us.

Expand full comment
C. P. Benischek's avatar

Fr. Gomulka, You may wish to ask whether Leo is a legitimate pope.

Calling him "pope" unreservedly--considering (inter alia) past and present violations of U. D. G.; considering he was made cardinal by Bergoglio who is on record as a rather flamboyant apostate and destroyer of the Church if not an Anti-pope as well (ergo without power to appoint legitimate cardinals; and considering the support of both men for blessings of active sodomfolk in Fiducia Supplicans which clearly violates the Second and the Sixth Commandments--would appear false and rash.

The product of--in the words of Archbishop Vigano--a usurper pope, namely Francis, would seem to be another usurper.

You know, presumably, the Lavender St Gallen Mafia forced out Pope Benedict. McCarrick, Cormac Murphy O'Connor, and Danneels--molesters or molester/pederast protectors all, have all admitted as much whether directly or indirectly (ie through Austin Ivereigh, Cormac's spox at the time..

I presume you know they installed Francis, the usurper.

You certainly know the Lavender Mafia as well as anyone. Clearly it is the Party of Francis. Both Francis and Leo have a horrific history of hiding shielding defending and enabling predator priests. It is diametrically opposed to the welfare of Holy Mother Church--as Francis amply indicated for the pst 12 years, and Leo has followed suit.

Do you doubt Francis and Leo are members? How can you not doubt they are valid popes?

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts